The Free Market Center
The Free Market Center
Economics textbooks tend to be large tomes, sometimes extending to near 1,000 pages. As readers, we often read a lot of descriptions without any clear pictures that depict the relationships described.
In addition to not having clear pictures of the dynamic relationships in economic systems, we don't get a clear sense of the behavior over time that results from these relationships.
System dynamics provides a way to simplify the explanations of economic theories, through the use of structured diagrams (particularly stock and flow models) that lay out the relationships of the elements described.
System dynamics, when used rigorously, can also provide a tool to help test the assumptions behind economic theories. Simply understanding the difference between stocks and flows can clarify statements about the economy. The terms debt and deficit, for example, tend to get used in the same sentence without distinction, yet, as stocks and flows, each has distinctly different characteristics.
I believe that system dynamics, and more specifically stock and flow diagrams, can provide a powerful tool in describing and understanding the principles and theories of economics. But, that belief comes with an important word of caution.
You might think of system dynamics models as highly complex, deductive statements. The discipline of deduction tells us that true premises combined with valid logic can only lead us to true conclusions. Similarly, system dynamics models that incorporate true premises in their underlying assumptions and incorporate the rigor of valid logic will give us true conclusions. As with other forms of deduction, however, if the model begins with false premises or the construction of the model uses flawed logic, the model will reach a false conclusion.
We have to exercise a great deal of care when building system dynamics models to assure the accuracy of our premises and the validity of our argument. This becomes especially important in modeling economic theory because of the prevalence of flawed theory in the realm of economic study.
The second caution comes in knowing the limits of the systems model. Because of the extreme complexity and adaptive nature (learning ability) of economic systems, we cannot build an accurate model of an economic system of significant size. The most we can hope to accomplish, therefore, consists of depicting economic principles and theories.
The models presented here, therefore, do not pretend to represent real systems. They represent, instead, theories that describe the behaviors of real systems.
We have three objectives in presenting this model of a simple economic system:
Now, let's proceed to the description of the development of the model in the Next tab (above)...
Since visitors to this site have varying degrees of understanding of system dynamics and economics, we want to first go through the process of developing a model of a simple economy. We will walk you through the following five steps:
© 2010—2024 The Free Market Center
& James B. Berger. All rights reserved.
To contact Jim Berger, e-mail:
© 2010—2020 The Free Market Center & James B. Berger. All rights reserved.
To contact Jim Berger, e-mail: